PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE 51 & THE ELECTION.

Who Shall I Vote For in a world where only those approved to lead by unknown powers are the only choices I am given?

I had a vision not all that long ago that whoever was elected as the President in the upcoming election somehow was never able to take office. It is not as strong as some of my visions have been ..however .. There have been some signs that such is possible.

After my vision I became aware of some legislation which could allow Bush to retain power should another 9/11 type event occur prior to the transfer of Presidential Power.

It’s called “Presidential Directive 51”

The following is from the official White house Press Release explaining the directive:


NATIONAL SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE/NSPD 51
HOMELAND SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE/HSPD-20
Subject: National Continuity Policy
Purpose
(1) This directive establishes a comprehensive national policy on the continuity of Federal Government structures and operations and a single National Continuity Coordinator responsible for coordinating the development and implementation of Federal continuity policies. This policy establishes "National Essential Functions," prescribes continuity requirements for all executive departments and agencies, and provides guidance for State, local, territorial, and tribal governments, and private sector organizations in order to ensure a comprehensive and integrated national continuity program that will enhance the credibility of our national security posture and enable a more rapid and effective response to and recovery from a national emergency.

FULL DOCUMENT AT: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/05/20070509-12.html

Put into simple English it basically makes it possible for those in Power (including the President) to RETAIN POWER ad infinitum in the event of a national emergency.

What constitutes such an emergency?

According to the definitions of this directive a “’Catastrophic Emergency’ means any incident, regardless of location, that results in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or disruption severely affecting the U.S. population, infrastructure, environment, economy, or government functions; “

Which means that even if such a “Catastrophic Emergency” were to occur OUTSIDE THE U.S. the President COULD basically take unlimited control.



So, there is no doubt that my vision is Possible… Look who signed this directive (ratified it).

Still, let us assume there is no Catastrophic Emergency.. Now the question would be “Who is best to hold the office of President?”

Both McCain and Obama have questionable connections and both seem equally tied into a system intent on talking about “Change” yet remaining “Status Quo”.

Back in the old days, defendants in famous trials got numbers -- the Chicago Eight, the Gang of Four, the Dave Clark Five, the Daytona 500. McCain was one of the "Keating Five," congressmen investigated on ethics charges for strenuously helping convicted racketeer Charles Keating after he gave them large campaign contributions and vacation trips.

Charles Keating was convicted of racketeering and fraud in both state and federal court after his Lincoln Savings & Loan collapsed, costing the taxpayers $3.4 billion. His convictions were overturned on technicalities; for example, the federal conviction was overturned because jurors had heard about his state conviction, and his state charges because Judge Lance Ito (yes, that judge) screwed up jury instructions. Neither court cleared him, and he faces new trials in both courts.)

Though he was not convicted of anything, McCain intervened on behalf of Charles Keating after Keating gave McCain at least $112,00 in contributions. In the mid-1980s, McCain made at least 9 trips on Keating's airplanes, and 3 of those were to Keating's luxurious retreat in the Bahamas. McCain's wife and father-in-law also were the largest investors (at $350,000) in a Keating shopping center; the Phoenix New Times called it a "sweetheart deal."

Senator Thad Cochran of Mississippi, who has known McCain for 35 years has said of him "The thought of [McCain] being president sends a cold chill down my spine. He is erratic. He is hotheaded. He loses his temper and he worries me."

Additionally, McCain may have rejected the endorsement of “Pro-Zionist” pastor John Hagee…

…YET…

McCain and Gingrich have been linked to Hagee for some time - a year ago they both appeared on TV to discuss current events as "World War III"; right-wing MK Benny Elon stated that they had got the talking-point from one of Hagee's books. But just how influential is the pastor? Jeff Sharlet offers some clues in the latest New Statesman, in a review of Nicholas Guyatt's Have a Nice Doomsday:

Guyatt's strongest chapters deal with Hagee, who "looks like a tubby Donald Rumsfeld" and "sounds a lot like a macaw". That's funny, but Hagee isn't: US politicians court his approval and the huge amounts of money that his Christians United for Israel can channel their way. In return, they parrot his prophecies, cleansed of the references that would reveal them as such - Hagee's conviction that the US may have to attack Israel [ouch - I think "Iran" is meant here - RB] as part of a scheme foretold in the Book of Ezekiel is sanitised as ostensibly sober-minded policy advice based on the needs of the nation rather than the scripture. Hagee, in turn, is invited on to CNN and Fox as a "Middle East expert" to advocate that very policy. Which is all the more disturbing when one considers that apocalypse preachers such as Hagee have a rather ambivalent relationship to America's welfare. For their predictions to be proven correct, the US will have to suffer a great deal more - a prospect they relish.

And to add an extra dimension to the information loop, Hagee claims that he receives briefings from "top Israeli government officials", who have told him about "a nuclear showdown between Iran and Israel".


The Jerusalem Post reports:
Earlier in the day, declared Republican candidate John McCain, an Arizona Senator, made a surprise appearance at the conference. He spoke about what he dubbed perhaps the "greatest evil" that the US and Israel have ever faced - radical Islam.
The senator spoke unequivocally about the need to "confront Iran" to prevent it from acquiring nuclear weapons...McCain called the current conflict a "vast ideological struggle" against "everything we stand for and believe in," and stressed the need to ensure Israel's safety as the only democracy in the Middle East, questioning that "if we fail in Israel, where will we succeed?"

As For Obama,

Barack Obama's top economics adviser is a member of the Skull & Bones society of Yale University, of which George H.W. Bush, George W. Bush, and John Kerry are also members, reliable sources confirmed tonight. Goolsbee is widely reported to have told Obama not to back a compulsory freeze on home mortgage foreclosures to help the struggling middle class in the current depression crisis, as demanded by former candidate John Edwards. Hillary Clinton has advocated a one-year voluntary freeze on foreclosures. Obama has offered counselors to comfort mortgage victims as they are dispossessed, citing the 'moral hazard' of protecting the public interest from Wall Street sharks.

By adding the infamous Skull & Bones secret society to his campaign roster, Obama, who bills himself as the candidate of change and hope, has attained a prefect trifecta of oligarchical and financier establishment backing for his attempt to seize the nomination of the Democratic Party for 2008. Obama's main overall image adviser and foreign policy adviser is Zbigniew Brzezinski, the co-founder of David Rockefeller's Trilateral Commission, and the mastermind of the disastrous Carter administration. Obama's wife Michelle is reputed to be closely linked to the Council on Foreign Relations. Behind the utopian platitudes dished up by the Illinois senator, the face of the Wall Street money elite comes into clearer and clearer focus.

So Then…

Who should we vote for?

Who can we trust?

Does it matter if both sides are only puppets for some unseen leadership?

I encourage you to research fully each candidate before you make a decision. Study in-depth the so-called “CHANGEs” that each candidate promises (and remember THEY ALWAYS PROMISE CHANGE (see video).




I still intend to vote and I would still encourage each of you to use your voting rights even if the elections were inconsequential or fraudulent. .. Just KNOW WHO OR WHAT YOU ARE VOTING FOR.. Don’t pick a candidate merely because they seem popular or somebody else you like said to vote for them. Vote like the future depends upon it…

..because.. IT DOES!

BE LOVE & BE LOVED!

Some information in this article provided by the following:
http://www.talk2action.org/story/2007/7/21/13236/0073
http://www.realchange.org/mccain.htm
http://fl0wer.net/secret_societies/skull_bones