THE NAME I CLAIM!

One subject that keeps coming up over and over again is about what I believe and why I believe what I believe. This often includes debate regarding the name I use and what I think of myself regarding the use of that name. Some contend that using the name JESUS as I present and use it is blasphemy while others think that it really does not matter what I call myself so long as I do not harm anyone nor demand that others MUST believe as I do.

Frankly anyone can call themselves whatever they like… That is called FREEDOM and I am quite aware that a claim that they have some spiritual right to use any name (Jesus, Buddha, God, Xenu, YHWH, etc. etc.) or make any claim of authority regarding the use or misuse of that name is questionable and cannot be proven , nor disproved by scientific method and thus is a matter of personal faith and belief.

The same freedom that allows people to choose their belief system and how the apply it extends to all words, names and claims. I see people on the internet using all sorts of alias names. Chances are many of you use a profile name that is not legally on your Birth Certificate and others have nicknames or shortened names they use daily and are referred to by all who know them.

An example in my own life is that I was called "JIM" up until 1989 and then because I was at that time on the fast track of my professional career that my given name on my Birth certificate (JAMES) was more appropriate for someone desiring to appear professional. The point here is that although before 1989 my checks and many legal documents actually read "JIM" and those were accepted as legal in spite of the fact it was not truly the name I had been legally given.

The same holds true of “JESUS“.

From the legal standpoint this name does not appear on anything that is not related to the internet and my ministry but I use the name to signify my purpose, calling and duty and I contend that I have the authority from God to use it exactly as I do.. And even if this were not true I could still use it because unless it is illegal to use an assumed name on the internet it is my right to call myself whatever I choose. For all anyone here knows I have legally changed my name to Jesus of Zion (which I have not yet done but have considered to stop the debate over this name). If I have done this and the government allows it then to tell me I could not use it at that point would be like me saying you have no right to your own name.

Quite frankly my full name actually confirms my beliefs but I will discuss that at another time since I feel no need to prove anything to anyone. I have only bothered to even discourse this because I value people enough to provide an answer even though I am in no way obligated to do so at all.

Names are only expressions of the self to define one person from another and one thing from another. They are labels so individuals can be recognized and acknowledged as individuals and so we have ways to express things and communicate ideas. Otherwise we would not have language or words at all and communication would simply cease to exist at all. A rose by any other name would still be a rose yet without a word to convey it if I needed you to bring me a rose how could I convey what I desired if we had no common word or reference tool?

I know one person on MySpace who goes by "Captain Awesome" yet I do not ask he prove he is either a "Captain" nor "Awesome"… I just call him what he chooses to refer to himself as with no debate over his authority to use the title.

I suppose the real debate about me is not actually the name I use but rather what do I claim regarding why I use this name and if perhaps I am implying something by it that is intended to defraud or convince people I am the Jesus they sing about in their places of worship.

I can understand that the name Jesus to some people is held up like an idol.

In many Christian faiths people believe that it is by this NAME that they are saved and that this NAME is somehow holy inun itself. If this were the case then many people of Hispanic heritage would be considered holy and subject to reverence and devotion.

Once when confronted on this issue I explained the above only to have someone point out that the Hispanic variation is pronounced "HAY SOOS" and therefore it is not the same as my usage but this is a naïve argument since at the time they said it I had yet to speak the name publicly and so how could they know how I pronounced my handle. Perhaps I spelled it JESUS but pronounced it "GEE ZOOS" or "JAH-EE-ZAHS" or ???. The argument of pronunciation is invalid unless God is nit-picky and if God were that much of a tight-ass then nobody has a chance and heaven is going to be no fun at all.

After examination of most of the worlds major religious beliefs and their sub-sects, cults, denominations, variances and other divisions I must admit that I am not anything like what they all claim to expect Jesus to be …but then Jesus of Nazareth was nothing like what the faith (Hebrew) awaiting the a messiahs coming expected either.

If JoN (Jesus of Naz) was indeed the messiah then it is well documented that only a few believed him at first and the people who represented the religious groups not only denies him but sought his destruction calling him a blasphemer, fraud and "demon-possessed".

Well, no matter who I am I certainly understand what it feels like to be rejected like this. The majority of those who say I am guilty of blasphemy and try to argue about my mission are those who teach and preach the Christian message and await the return of the Christ/Messiah.

(Blasphemy's definition can be found by looking it up on any online dictionary and how I use the name does NOT qualify)

Please realize that I do not claim to be the whole manifestation of God.. nor do I use the name to make fun of , mock nor defame the spirit of God and/or Jesus. Those who think that I do either of these are making assumptions that I define my faith by their version of what or who God and Jesus are and to do this is to claim more authority over me than I would ever claim over anyone else. Thus since I do not claim such “all-powerful” authority nor seek worship how then could I be guilty of blasphemy?

Even if I made such claims I do not believe there would be anyone but God who could correct me since to do so would then be presumptuous that your religious belief system was superior to my own and thus perhaps it could make the person confronting me guilty of exactly the same thing they claim I am in breach of.

I am not here to define which religion is correct. I do not define my calling by any religious authority other than what is true in my heart and never do I enforce, coerce nor demand that anyone believe anything I believe. My task is only to listen to what I feel is God and share what I feel this entity wishes me to do, be and share boldly and as I feel led to do so.

If I am wrong only God will correct me and I am only accountable to God who I call “My/Our Father“.

I am really sick of all the hatefulness that people use to try and support and defend their religious convictions. Anyone coming to me who holds up their religious definition of what Jesus should be or should not be is walking some pretty dangerous ground in my opinion. I believe every person has the absolute right to believe whatever they feel is correct and share this belief as boldly as I do (right or wrong) without others getting all upset about it and feeling that they are doing God's will by playing the judge and claiming that what they believe supersedes the belief of anyone else.

In my studies I have sought not to take up a faith and define all others by it.. Rather I was led to study each faith and idea I was led to by coming at it as if it could be the correct idea and then examining logically the various ideas they propose. This is opposed to the typical idea that there is one idea or faith that holds all truth and the rest are hopelessly wrong.

Christianity is not a single idea or series of dogmas and doctrines. There are a few common elements but overall the divisions each have flaws and none (in my opinion based on years of personal critical study) could possibly claim to be the “one and only” denomination or belief that is 100% correct… In Fact, because Christians cannot even agree with each other they should be a lot less presumptive that their VERSION of truth has enough authority to use as the measure by which all the others get judged.

People should be glad I am not the Jesus they claim to have faith in because if I was then I would condemn all the Churches to Hell because I have yet to see ONE that actually lives as the church of Jesus Christ was intended (originally Churches were to be communal living environments in which all members held all things in common and gave up individual selfish ownership to care for each other as a group and then to take any extra resources out to give to those who had need).

No, today's so-called Churches are not at all like what I believe was intended by God and since the last plea of Jesus of Nazareth (JoN) on earth was that "They may be United (as one)" none do this and still they all debate who has God's favor and teaches the absolute truth.

Because I value first the most basic idea that God is LOVE and that only LOVE can be the weight or measure of Faith then in reality anyone who gets upset or angry enough to seek to defame or harm anyone else violates this and invalidates everything else they might think they understand. Love does not try to use fear and intimidation to persuade people to accept truth. Love understands that each person has a unique path and purpose and that no human can actually claim spiritual authority over another at all.

Fear will never persuade anyone but the ignorant and uneducated to accept anything. Intimidation likewise is not at all a method by which to persuade people to accept any God … much less one who is the essence of “loving-kindness“.

I did not find my God in a book… I did not find my God in a dogma.. I did not find my God in a religion nor church and I did not find my God in being coerced or convinced by someone else. I found what I call God in a deeply personal way that began in my inner being and then incorporated any other elements only to examine and define my own inner reality.

I came through the religious system and was well trained in conventional Christianity. When I attended a Lutheran School in my teens I was trained in Evangelism and Apologetics. I was shown methods to "help people know Jesus as their personal Lord and Savior" and given tools to lead people to Christ. I went from home to home in pairs and at each door we would leave a bible tract and if we were able to we would spend time with the resident sharing "the Love of Jesus" with them.

But, even then I felt something was wrong with the methodology of what we were doing. It was all too "packaged" and in reality I was not trained in any other ideas beyond "Christian thinking" to be able to really discuss any differences in other religious idea beyond what we were taught was the ONLY WAY TO HEAVEN and now I feel very bad about the fact that I, no matter how well meaning, made God out to be prejudiced and cruel.

Even the initial question we were given to ask was presented in a way that in retrospect could have been considered as being fraudulent.. Since we claimed it was asked as part of a survey when in reality it was to confront the person in a way to begin a dialog.

I recall using tally sheets that had YES or NO on it but never were these responses actually used for any real study I am aware of since we never turned them in (This is fraud isn't it? and if so then does it not seem odd to use fraud to teach ethics, morals and supposed truth? )

Anyway, the question was "If you were to die tonight would you be sure that you would go to heaven?". Now come on guys… lets look at that question because not only is it confrontational but it is assumptive that "heaven" exists and also it potentially elicits the fear of death. This question is well known by many Christian faiths in their efforts to "lead people to Christ" by the way and only after I got older and better educated did I even realize how this question assumes that the person asking it has all the answers.

There is no proof of faith.

Faith itself is based on the concept that God cannot be proven and that it is belief in the unbelievable that God honors most (Hebrews 11). If God were so manifest that there was no doubt He existed then there could be nothing called "Faith" since no faith is required when proof is available.

This method of Evangelism so popular in today's churches is flawed in logic and would seem to go against the very idea that God is Love. It tells people that god loves them so much that if they don't believe in Him they will be sent to a place where they will be tortured eternally (Hell). Is this what God desires?… Does anyone really in their Spirit believe that God would hide and then say if you don't find him you would die horribly and never have any chance of redemption? Why does no one question this teaching and see it's lack of logic?.. for if there is a Blasphemy then it is to represent God as an arrogant, self absorbed asshole who puts a gun to your head and says find me or die.
So, for those wondering I am not the Jesus of this type of teaching. I am not the Jesus who is the Only way and I am Not the Jesus who promotes death over and above Life. I am the Jesus I am told to be by a loving God I believe in who told me to show people how to Love each other. I do not promote any specific church group or religious belief.. nor do I tell people they MUST believe me or God will get them.

So, what Jesus am I? I am the one I am and I am the one who is here to just be here doing the work I feel I am to do. I do not uphold myself as worthy of worship nor do I tell you I am the ultimate authority on all truth. My body and my brain are only that of a human being and I have no miracles to prove anything to anyone. I don't have to be what people demand I be nor will I be manipulated by religion to try and be what they think I should be.

I may have faults, sins and imperfections as much as anyone else but those who can read the Bible beyond the traditional theologically accepted ideas might see that perhaps Jesus of Nazareth (JoN). Was a tad more human than many wish to believe.

Blasphemy you say to believe that JoN. Might have had human frailties?

I say it is Blasphemy to think anything with one cell of humanity in it could be perfect for to be perfect is to not be a human at all and then what would be Jesus but God only and as such could not understand anything of what it means to be human. Logic alone should show that if Jesus was to have even the meaning being promoted in today's churches that He had to be capable of making mistakes and “missing the mark” occasionally.

In the Bible Jesus was once approached by a guy who began with "GOOD Sir…" and he was Cut off by Jesus quickly and told emphatically "I am NOT GOOD.. Only the Father in Heaven is GOOD".

So tell me then, if Jesus himself stated in scripture that he was not good (meaning perfect) where did this teaching come from and how does it effect the religious teaching that Jesus is God and Perfect as God is Perfect?

Only religion defines things this way.. Even the council that created this teaching argued over it and it created a problem that resulted in a major controversy (but who bothers to go and look at the history???… most do not question such things or even seek them out fairly.. They just hear a preacher or priest tell them how it is and assume it is the absolute truth… Did God then give us a mind that questions and then tell us not to? What of the thoughts of Marcian (see:http://mb-soft.com/believe/txs/chalcedo.htm )?

Howbeit even though this sounds like I am questioning Jesus all I am truly questioning is that what is taught regarding Jesus may be worthy of reassessing .

Why be afraid of the difficult questions?

Why fear examining where the concepts we believe came from and if perhaps what we are told may have been redefined by a religious organization or organizations for reasons other than concern for our souls perhaps it is a sin NOT to question and get things back to what is real.

I don't fear being wrong..

…I fear accepting what is wrong and calling it “right“. Truth IS truth and so question away folks because truth cannot be changed and only by questioning truth can it be examined enough to divide out the errors within it.

Some of you are likely to think I am going to Hell for what I share here and if you do think that.. Prove I am wrong… Prove that God exists first though and I want absolute proof before you begin tossing stones at me. Prove JoN walked the earth and prove he was perfect with more than just a feeling or belief or church doctrine. Prove Hell exists and show me where Heaven is because I believe I do know the answers to these things and I am here to share all of it with you and already have.. But I admit what I shared may not have proof but at least I take logic into account and do not just accept what is taught without questioning it.

I can't prove ANYTHING but if you are honest you have to admit you cannot either.

So am I the Jesus expected at the End of Days? Did God personally in myself tell me to do as I am doing or not? Am I a Blasphemer or a caring soul trying to live out my calling? Don't answer unless you can PROVE that I am nothing without defining it only by a feeling, emotion, religion or faith because those things too cannot be weighed or measured so I cannot be fairly judged by them.

In a courtroom one must only show proof if challenged .. But really the first Burdon of proof is upon the person doing the challenging thus the Burdon of proof is not mine for I do not have to prove anything since I allow anyone the freedom to believe anything even if I think it's wrong… but likewise I share where I think it might be wrong only to find truth and not to judge other people… I am free to be and express anything I like but if you wish to debate who I am first show me something,.., anything.. Which proves whatever you contend for I am not bound by individual definitions and I say there is no authority in heaven or on earth that can provide evidence sufficient to suggest their truth is greater than my own.. Save God Alone… and if you wish to condemn or correct me by claiming you know God better than I then please write me and I will give you my address and ask you to bring Him over to prove it… which cannot be done .

Realize this is not intended to be an argument or something to debate. I believe what I believe because I personally have enough evidence within myself to support my personal faith.

I will listen to any who feels differently and you may say as you like but if you wish to change me you MUST provide scientific proof that I am wrong . I do not feel this can be done so all I ever really have asked is not that anyone believe me but only to give me your ear and consider my ideas as you study yourself.

NEVER WORSHIP A MAN.. ONLY THE CREATOR DESERVES WORSHIP AND IN MY OPINION I DO NOT BELIEVE HE EVER DEMANDS IT.. The demands are made only by humans who construct religions to define what they believe but any religion that forces or intimidates people into it's belief system is, in my opinion, A DANGEROUIS CULT and too mean and self absorbed to be anything near what I believe would be the faith of that which I call My Father.

I am not bound by any faiths opinion of me nor will I ever accept it's judgments of me…. Likewise any judgments I give are only my own and I shall never judge "people" except in one thing which is this:
Is this person seeking to BE LOVE???

… and if so then I will trust the God I believe in to guide them and help them and my only task is to boldly speak my understandings to the best of my abilities and be available to help my Brothers and Sisters to be the best they can be and to manifest REAL LOVE on this sad planet.

My faith is mine alone and your faith is your own and in the end we will see what God has to say and let HIM judge us . Until then I will do as I feel is right and if anyone tries to stop me from what I am supposed to do then I will disregard their objections and continue anyway until God Himself corrects me or guides me otherwise.

I am JESUS OF ZION and that is a part of myself I have come to value most …for it is not James the body or brain that defines me. Rather it is the Spirit that baptized me in which I find my definition and purpose and by that spirit shall I continue to serve what is my purpose as it is known only to myself and my God.

I love you all and thank you for your friendship. I hope that you will be open enough to accept that I am not likely to change my modes operandi because it happens to offend a few people but ask why it offends you for when Christians become Christians and are baptized does not each one claim a part of the Spirit of Jesus?

How is what I am doing wrong if this be so?…

…In effect the old self (James) is first buried.. Then healed, fulfilled and given purpose by the Spirit of Christ.. Do not many Christians say this?… Yet where are my brothers and sisters who truly make it this much a part of their life? Where is the rest of myself who loves without judging and shares in my duty and name?

Is my Spirit alone… or am I more… for if there are more of me then please let them know I await them or if I am the only one? Hm? Well I will let you all consider and you can come to your own conclusions..

…Meanwhile I will just do what I was sent to do.

BE LOVE & BE LOVED!
JoZ (JESUS of Zion)

LETTERS IN THE WALL (Obama joins JoZ and others in an old tradition)

................................................ While Obama was in Israel he placed a letter containing a prayer in the "wailing Wall".

Following Jewish tradition, Obama donned a yarmulke and went to the Western Wall, Judaism's holiest site, where shortly before dawn on Thursday he stuffed his prayer into a crevass between the giant white stones, hewn over 2,000 years ago.

Traditionally such prayers, and there are over a million every year, some arriving by fax and email, are collected twice a year and buried on the Mount of Olives.

Although it is not usually proper to read such letters a yeshiva student pulled the note, handwritten on King David Hotel stationery, out of the Wall, and Ma'ariv published it.

It Reads:

"Lord, Protect my family and me. Forgive me my sins and help me guard against pride and despair. Give me the wisdom to do what is right and just. And make me an instrument of your will."

The Wall's rabbi, Shmuel Rabinovitz, said Friday that publication of the note violated Obama's privacy.

Since Obama's letter is now out I decided that it was time to now reveal my own letter sent to the city of Jerusalem by E-Mail

The E-Mail copy was placed in the cracks of “Wailing Wall” last summer (2007) by a friend who lives there and who admitted to being a bit fearful about doing it since at the time the level of potential violence in the old part of the city was quite high.

I wish to make it again clear that I although I am not a ZionIST I do respect my Hebrew brothers and sisters and although I am not a traditionalist I do enjoy taking part in some of the traditions of many faiths.

I believe in the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob but I believe this is the same God of many beliefs.. since there is only ONE GOD... and I call that God EL YHWH JEHOVAH ELOHIM yet some might better know Him as "LOVE"!

"LORD YHWH... WHOM I SERVE!
YOU ALONE ARE MY GOD AND I AM BUT A SERVANT TO YOU AND YOUR PEOPLE.
THANK YOU FATHER THAT YOU GUIDE AND DIRECT MY STEPS.
LET ME NOT STUMBLE BUT LEAD ME TO THE FULLNESS OF MY PURPOSE OF WHICH YOU DESIRE (whatsoever that may be).
MAY ALL WHO SEEK YOU BE BLESSED BY YOU AND MAY I SERVE YOU EACH MOMENT AS YOU WOULD HAVE ME TO SERVE YOU IN HELPING OTHERS FIND YOUR HEALING, KNOWLEDGE, PEACE AND LOVE.
PRAISE YOU AND PRAISE ALSO UNTO ZION... YOUR HOLY CITY AND TEMPLE!
selah...AMEN!
JESUS OF ZION
Now it shall come to pass in the latter days that the mountain of YHWH's house shall be established on the top of the mountains, and shall be exalted above the hills; and all nations shall flow to it. Many people shall come and say, "Come, and let us go up to the mountain of YHWH, to the house of the God of Jacob; He will teach us His ways, and we shall walk in His paths." For out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of YHWH form Jerusalem. He shall judge between the nations, and shall rebuke many people; They shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; Nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war anymore. Isaiah 2:2-4"

Have You Ever Seen a UFO?..I have!

Today the History Channel has featured several episodes of the “UFO Hunters” and It reminded me that occasionally I have people ask me my opinion regarding UFO’s, aliens and such.

Most of the time I avoid these types of subjects.. mostly because although I love the mysteries (which I began to explore when I was only a small child) they tend to be divisive and I am looked at oddly enough without bringing in too many extraneous things that aren't actually relevant to my calling and mission.

Yet, for those who are interested in these things I have done a huge amount of research and had some very odd personal experiences both physically and spiritually which I feel could benefit others who have had similar experiences.

So.. Here goes…

I had my first UFO experience when I was 13 (Late Summer 1974). 4 people witnessed it and it was verified by a smart mother of two of the witnesses who sent us with crayons and paper to separate rooms of the house to draw what we saw... We were all shocked when we all came back with almost exactly the same rendering.

Basically it looked like a dark triangular form/craft (sort of like the "Stealth Fighter") and had three distinct lights. One central which was also the largest and appeared domed. It was glowing and pulsing White and there were two other lights that were reddish on each wing(?)... they had a softer glow and seemed more flat than the White domed light.

This "Whatever it was" actually zipped in a eye blink's period of time... directly above all of us... This thing "Dead stopped" (on a dime and with no recoil or backlash.)

Then for approximately 20-30 seconds it hovered silently and as though planted firmly in the air. then it zipped away as quickly as it had approached. It left only a momentary quick blur (Due South to Due North) and not only did it make no sound.. It actually seemed to block out any sound.. all seemed to go quiet instantly.

It was either very close or very big because it almost seemed like it was within reach and it blocked out the moon and stars behind it.

In retrospect, I would estimate it was at least as large as a modern Jet airplane and maybe about 100 or so feet above us.. also I recall that there may have been two other "???'s" that continued North and did not stop.. but this was so long ago and the event so bizarre at the time that some details have become vague over the years and so there are a few things I cannot recall in detail... But I attest this DID happen and I am conveying it as best I can over 30 years later.. so bare with me.

Frankly, after the "???" zipped away, I was so scared that I didn't care where it went and I took off running in terror for the door of my friends house followed by the two boys (9 and 10) and the girl (14). I ran into their screen door and almost broke it when the others came slamming in from behind.

We were all unable to speak more than pointing and mumbling about a huge thing in the sky BUT before any of us could say too much the mother shut us up and sent us off to draw whatever it was we saw.. smart mom!

Yes, we ALL drew basically the same thing!

A few years later I happened to catch an old B-Movie on TV made in the 60's that still gives me chills to watch. It's called "Robinson Crusoe on Mars". If you get a chance to see that then you will see vividly a very, very close approximation of how this thing moved and even the general shape.

That event led to me being VERY interested in finding out what I was dealing with and I kind of became a bit obsessed (not quite as bad as the guy in Close Encounters.. but close.. LOL) with UFO's, Science Fiction, Speculative Oddities and Anomalies and Ancient History.

If you want to see some weird stuff that does not make sense based on currently taught history GOOGLE: "OOPARTS" (Stands for "Out of Place Artifacts").

I have come to believe now that what I actually saw was a Top secret US Military prototype craft (called Project: Raven (AKA/ Project: Blackbird), and some sources suggest it is probably a forerunner of the Stealth Fighter.. which may in itself be cover for an even more secret stealth flight vehicles not currently released to public knowledge...(YUK.. I distain Government Secrecy)

Anyway, I could only locate limited info on this project due to it being highly classified and found nothing truly believable until the late 80's. I understand part of the project was later said to have been closed down because the Govt. could not find a light enough substance that would not melt from air friction caused by the ultra-high velocity and apparently they were shooting these things all over the country in the Mid 70's to Early 80's... but each came back after the test flights as being dangerous to re-launch due to "severe damage caused by friction"...Although again, realize it was difficult just locating this much info. and there is more speculation and conjecture.. but so much is still classified… so even this information is speculative since I have no actual proof.

Another friend who claims to have some Govt. insider friends led me to the fact that the original design and flight abilities may have been based on the "Vimana" written about in Hindu Texts.. Below is a link regarding the Vimana and apparently there are texts in some temples that tell exactly how to build and fly these things...Realize that that eastern thought is different than western thought and so when we read sacred texts from the East it all looks pretty odd.. But frankly to an Eastern thinker the western view seems just as weird.

I have yet to actually see these texts so at this point I can neither confirm nor deny they exist.. But is was mentioned on a history channel show a while back as being true.. so... I tend to believe it based on my other ancient history explorations which confirm and conform that the world was once much different than it is today... One clue to this I will add for you to consider is these questions after reading Genesis 11:1 - 9: Why in the Bible does God get upset about the building of a Tower (Babel) that he actually causes people to have to be divided? Could this Tower be more than just a common tall structure? Why would God seem to be concerned.. we build lots of towers today? I'll let the readers consider that one.

Here is the link regarding Vimana:

http://www.answers.com/topic/vimana

(NOTE You will need to scan down a bit to where it refers to the Wikapedia Info regarding the Hindu meaning and it will supply an overview).

I have many other odd occurrences including a horrifying "face to face" encounter with what some call "Greys" ...(but these are what I believe to be semi-physical demons who have no actual emotions but VERY high technical knowledge).

It is my belief (again after much study on the subjects of both Ufology and Demonology) that these "grey", large headed, big eyed beings are capable of actually moving in and out of the physical world (Interdimentionally) but cannot have any contact with humans UNLESS they move from "etheric spirit" (5+ -D) to "Physical Matter" (1-D to 3-D). Note: The 4-D is a transition point between etheric and physical and one might say that they hide in the 4-D realm/ Time)

Further I believe these beings DO use a form of physical vehicle at times (As was found at Roswell) and they are part of those demons who fell.

My research would indicate that they require odd physical things to maintain their physical nature such as animal parts since they actually would like to be human to "feel" and have "emotions".. They are intellectually brilliant yet cold, dark and seemingly uncaring of anything but what they desire. Originally created to be filled with light and Serve YHWH when they fell they lost their light and actually started convincing man to sacrifice each other in order to retrieve "parts“.. sick huh?.

Although they have been around as long as humanity has been on the earth they have (with discretion) made contact as it benefited them... always making the most believable claim at the time.. Back in history they claimed often to be "gods" and now they find it better to claim to be "aliens"

The "grey daemonic entities" are one of the types of fallen beings who cleverly made government contacts to get help in their quest. Realize the Bible speaks of many types of angelic Hosts and demonic beings (principalities, Powers, rulers.. Etc). The "alien" rouse began (according to some fairly reputable sources) when they made contact with NAZI leadership and whereas HIMMLER was fully aware of what they really were (Demons.. Himmler was a known Satanist and demon worshiper).. the few scientists who needed an explanation were given the cover story that Aliens have come from another world to assist the so-called "Master Race".

Humans themselves are a fallen "spirit centralized“.. (containing the very "breath of God/ eternal life") creation BUT since we are not cut-off completely we have the ability to find a way back to our Creator.. They, who wish to have eternal life to "do their own thing", realize that if they do not become "as God's greatest creation...MAN" that they shall eventually parish... hence the desperation.. Cattle mutilations and frequent abductions (to glean spare cells, parts, sperm, eggs, etc to conduct their "experiments").

As I understand this the abductions of humans are supposed to be limited by some kind of pact and they often look for individuals who live in remote areas, lack education or they feel they are people who will not be believed.. Sadly, many govt's are being duped to help them seek a way to cross breed with humans (thus gaining a soul that can be forgiven and have feelings) in exchange for their technologies.. which are ancient and amazing.

They, of course, along with a few other types of Demons, using the guise that they come from Other planets and are "Aliens" rather than the truth that they are fallen angels at war with God's plan.

Just as NAZI LEADER "HIMMLER" (Hitler was a puppet leader by the way and acted more as a spokesperson.. Himmler actually gave more orders) knew about what they really were... Certain powerful leaders are likewise aware of what is really going on.

Groups such as the Illuminati, The Brotherhood, The CIA, The Rothchilds, The Bilderburg Group, The Committee of 300, The World Trade Organization, The Masonic Order, The Skull and Bones and many other groups have elite members who openly worship Lucifer and other demonic beings... But not all members of these Orgs are in the know.. some members are even given disinformation so they can openly attest honestly that the Orgs are harmless.

Yet, Those who mention or call attention to the "real power" of these groups are silenced in some way. Most are just labeled as "Conspiracy Theorists", "Crackpots" or "Misinformed fools" and that means that even if they speak truth people just assume they are crazy or paranoid people... But, in some cases the person who could bring the truth forward is either in an unfortunate accident, goes missing and/or is killed.

Secret Societies are used because Silence is the name of the game and once in the know you are in for life. Most presidents are like Hitler and know little or maybe believe the "Alien" cover story (which in itself is supposed to be kept ABOVE Top Secret). But The Bush family, for example, is far too engrained in the power. wealth and connections for them to Not know.

Check this site: www.yourchristianpresident.com
(then use that info to actually check and verify... I like to see people actually do their own research rather than just buy what I say... It's all verifiable if you will take the time to look.. but realize, the powers that be would rather you felt it too much trouble)

Now as for the "Grey Demon's", they have a semi-physical body that is capable of dying if damaged while in full physical form... Their "conscious personality" (NOT A TRUE SPIRIT as man has spirit) simply migrates to another "body".. The intellect within has millions of years of accumulated knowledge and they are well aware of all that is possible technically and have even been involved in bringing forward knowledge of such things as Atomic Weapons development, Night Vision, Fiber Optics and many other things that originally were for military use.. Oh, how these things LOVE WAR.

Have I blown your mind yet? Do I sound like a madman? Perhaps now you think I must be a Looney.. Years ago I might have thought so myself and I guess you can see why I share this type of info very carefully. It sounds like paranoia, madness and delusional science fiction stories but it is gleaned from thousands of hours of research, prayer, cross-checking varied stories, Comparative studies and anything I could do to locate any and all info. (and of Course revelation from God to confirm that what I believe and have learned is not just a bunch of hogwash).

I never knowingly pass on a known untruth (aka LIE) and if something is later found in error will be the first to admit I was wrong and correct those who I may have inadvertently misguided. So far I have found nothing that has made what I believe to be entirely invalid and almost everyday I find yet another fact or news story that supports my findings, belief and faith.

I have one friend here on Myspace who I have checked into and his credentials and he checks out as legit.. although slanted by his own beliefs to some degree.

He was once a "CIA/Brotherhood Psy-Ops Operative" involved in "mind-control" and "disinformation" and, learning the truth about what is really going on and what he himself had been forced to do left his high position and turned on the Government to inform people of many of the things I have given you hints of here.

Yes, He unfortunately believes these beings are Aliens.. rather than demons.. but He actually claims to have had access to these beings personally. I have verified to my satisfaction that he is not mentally ill or speaking out his "you-know-what" and his validation of many of my beliefs (sometimes with more detail or correction in things like time-lines and current project status... Beware "HAARP" by the way... Google it for more info)

He is a big-time "freedom fighter" on Myspace and is trying to reveal the truth to any who will listen...(we have had some very interesting discussions)

O.K.... That's quite a bit to digest today I suppose... (You wanted some "meat" today.. well, I hope it digest well..LOL) It was nice to have someone to vent it to who is interested in such topics and who I think can handle the truth. It is not something I like to talk about too much but it's sometimes frustrating to have so much knowledge and no one to tell without appearing to need medication or being called "crazy".. Oh, I get that a lot and I actually have been evaluated by the State of Oregon and found sane.. because I wanted to make sure I wasn't just losing my mind..LOL

Just know that if any UFO's land and claim to be from another world or angels of YHWH ...DO NOT GO WITH THEM if you can help it. They DO respond adversely to the name "Jesus" when said in faith . They do not like that name WHEN BELIEVED IN BY FAITH AND CORRECTLY USED (Realize if incorrectly spoken it has no effect and some demons even take the very name Jesus as a cover to delude people into a false understanding of truth and false religious belief systems.. such as the many UFO cults).

I had one other encounter that I will hold for another time.. This one even more scary than simply seeing an unidentifiable object in the sky.

Most Christians are sadly unaware of some of these ODD realities because they never step outside their own church to view the totality of understanding.. some actually fear they could fall into error But to be educated one must take all knowledge and strain it through wisdom and Love to get to the REAL TRUTH.

I am not trying to tell anyone WHAT to think or believe.. Rather, Please take what I share and do your own checks.

Pray and seek wisdom for if you ask for a loaf of bread by faith and living in the truth of Love God will not let you fall forever into a pit of snakes (and even if you did they would not be able to destroy you and God would rescue you). Know all that is Knowable.. Learn all that is learnable. Use not the ways and teachings of men to weigh out truth from error.. use the Holy Spirit and the measure of Love.. For if what you learn does not ultimately have Love as it's base it is not truth and benefits none.

Study.. Think.. and BELIEVE in the True God.. EL YHWH JEHOVAH ELOHIM.. WHO IS THE FIRST and LAST.. THE ALPHA and THE OMEGA. THE GREAT AND POWERFUL CREATOR OF ALL THAT EXISTS NOW AND FOREVER AND WHOSE VERY SUBSTANCE & ESSENCE IS LOVE!

Even these demons have their reason for being allowed.

One more thing (head spinning yet...heehee...LOL)... Some ask me why there is evil.. My answer is thus: Because without an opposite of goodness and Love we cannot truly experience the choice to seek Goodness and Love... Thus Evil is the Absence of God as Darkness is the Absence of Light. For now we actually need both until all can be made perfect and THEN we will know that since we do not desire to be where God is not present we will WANT to be with him and then perfection can exist Forever Eternally... Amen?.. Amen!

BE LOVE & BE LOVED!

MY FAVORITE ARTIST - Akiane

JUST WATCH.. There are no words to do this young girl justice!










PLEASE VISIT HER WEBSITE AT: www.artakiane.com/

BE LOVE & BE LOVED!

PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE 51 & THE ELECTION.

Who Shall I Vote For in a world where only those approved to lead by unknown powers are the only choices I am given?

I had a vision not all that long ago that whoever was elected as the President in the upcoming election somehow was never able to take office. It is not as strong as some of my visions have been ..however .. There have been some signs that such is possible.

After my vision I became aware of some legislation which could allow Bush to retain power should another 9/11 type event occur prior to the transfer of Presidential Power.

It’s called “Presidential Directive 51”

The following is from the official White house Press Release explaining the directive:


NATIONAL SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE/NSPD 51
HOMELAND SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE/HSPD-20
Subject: National Continuity Policy
Purpose
(1) This directive establishes a comprehensive national policy on the continuity of Federal Government structures and operations and a single National Continuity Coordinator responsible for coordinating the development and implementation of Federal continuity policies. This policy establishes "National Essential Functions," prescribes continuity requirements for all executive departments and agencies, and provides guidance for State, local, territorial, and tribal governments, and private sector organizations in order to ensure a comprehensive and integrated national continuity program that will enhance the credibility of our national security posture and enable a more rapid and effective response to and recovery from a national emergency.

FULL DOCUMENT AT: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/05/20070509-12.html

Put into simple English it basically makes it possible for those in Power (including the President) to RETAIN POWER ad infinitum in the event of a national emergency.

What constitutes such an emergency?

According to the definitions of this directive a “’Catastrophic Emergency’ means any incident, regardless of location, that results in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or disruption severely affecting the U.S. population, infrastructure, environment, economy, or government functions; “

Which means that even if such a “Catastrophic Emergency” were to occur OUTSIDE THE U.S. the President COULD basically take unlimited control.



So, there is no doubt that my vision is Possible… Look who signed this directive (ratified it).

Still, let us assume there is no Catastrophic Emergency.. Now the question would be “Who is best to hold the office of President?”

Both McCain and Obama have questionable connections and both seem equally tied into a system intent on talking about “Change” yet remaining “Status Quo”.

Back in the old days, defendants in famous trials got numbers -- the Chicago Eight, the Gang of Four, the Dave Clark Five, the Daytona 500. McCain was one of the "Keating Five," congressmen investigated on ethics charges for strenuously helping convicted racketeer Charles Keating after he gave them large campaign contributions and vacation trips.

Charles Keating was convicted of racketeering and fraud in both state and federal court after his Lincoln Savings & Loan collapsed, costing the taxpayers $3.4 billion. His convictions were overturned on technicalities; for example, the federal conviction was overturned because jurors had heard about his state conviction, and his state charges because Judge Lance Ito (yes, that judge) screwed up jury instructions. Neither court cleared him, and he faces new trials in both courts.)

Though he was not convicted of anything, McCain intervened on behalf of Charles Keating after Keating gave McCain at least $112,00 in contributions. In the mid-1980s, McCain made at least 9 trips on Keating's airplanes, and 3 of those were to Keating's luxurious retreat in the Bahamas. McCain's wife and father-in-law also were the largest investors (at $350,000) in a Keating shopping center; the Phoenix New Times called it a "sweetheart deal."

Senator Thad Cochran of Mississippi, who has known McCain for 35 years has said of him "The thought of [McCain] being president sends a cold chill down my spine. He is erratic. He is hotheaded. He loses his temper and he worries me."

Additionally, McCain may have rejected the endorsement of “Pro-Zionist” pastor John Hagee…

…YET…

McCain and Gingrich have been linked to Hagee for some time - a year ago they both appeared on TV to discuss current events as "World War III"; right-wing MK Benny Elon stated that they had got the talking-point from one of Hagee's books. But just how influential is the pastor? Jeff Sharlet offers some clues in the latest New Statesman, in a review of Nicholas Guyatt's Have a Nice Doomsday:

Guyatt's strongest chapters deal with Hagee, who "looks like a tubby Donald Rumsfeld" and "sounds a lot like a macaw". That's funny, but Hagee isn't: US politicians court his approval and the huge amounts of money that his Christians United for Israel can channel their way. In return, they parrot his prophecies, cleansed of the references that would reveal them as such - Hagee's conviction that the US may have to attack Israel [ouch - I think "Iran" is meant here - RB] as part of a scheme foretold in the Book of Ezekiel is sanitised as ostensibly sober-minded policy advice based on the needs of the nation rather than the scripture. Hagee, in turn, is invited on to CNN and Fox as a "Middle East expert" to advocate that very policy. Which is all the more disturbing when one considers that apocalypse preachers such as Hagee have a rather ambivalent relationship to America's welfare. For their predictions to be proven correct, the US will have to suffer a great deal more - a prospect they relish.

And to add an extra dimension to the information loop, Hagee claims that he receives briefings from "top Israeli government officials", who have told him about "a nuclear showdown between Iran and Israel".


The Jerusalem Post reports:
Earlier in the day, declared Republican candidate John McCain, an Arizona Senator, made a surprise appearance at the conference. He spoke about what he dubbed perhaps the "greatest evil" that the US and Israel have ever faced - radical Islam.
The senator spoke unequivocally about the need to "confront Iran" to prevent it from acquiring nuclear weapons...McCain called the current conflict a "vast ideological struggle" against "everything we stand for and believe in," and stressed the need to ensure Israel's safety as the only democracy in the Middle East, questioning that "if we fail in Israel, where will we succeed?"

As For Obama,

Barack Obama's top economics adviser is a member of the Skull & Bones society of Yale University, of which George H.W. Bush, George W. Bush, and John Kerry are also members, reliable sources confirmed tonight. Goolsbee is widely reported to have told Obama not to back a compulsory freeze on home mortgage foreclosures to help the struggling middle class in the current depression crisis, as demanded by former candidate John Edwards. Hillary Clinton has advocated a one-year voluntary freeze on foreclosures. Obama has offered counselors to comfort mortgage victims as they are dispossessed, citing the 'moral hazard' of protecting the public interest from Wall Street sharks.

By adding the infamous Skull & Bones secret society to his campaign roster, Obama, who bills himself as the candidate of change and hope, has attained a prefect trifecta of oligarchical and financier establishment backing for his attempt to seize the nomination of the Democratic Party for 2008. Obama's main overall image adviser and foreign policy adviser is Zbigniew Brzezinski, the co-founder of David Rockefeller's Trilateral Commission, and the mastermind of the disastrous Carter administration. Obama's wife Michelle is reputed to be closely linked to the Council on Foreign Relations. Behind the utopian platitudes dished up by the Illinois senator, the face of the Wall Street money elite comes into clearer and clearer focus.

So Then…

Who should we vote for?

Who can we trust?

Does it matter if both sides are only puppets for some unseen leadership?

I encourage you to research fully each candidate before you make a decision. Study in-depth the so-called “CHANGEs” that each candidate promises (and remember THEY ALWAYS PROMISE CHANGE (see video).




I still intend to vote and I would still encourage each of you to use your voting rights even if the elections were inconsequential or fraudulent. .. Just KNOW WHO OR WHAT YOU ARE VOTING FOR.. Don’t pick a candidate merely because they seem popular or somebody else you like said to vote for them. Vote like the future depends upon it…

..because.. IT DOES!

BE LOVE & BE LOVED!

Some information in this article provided by the following:
http://www.talk2action.org/story/2007/7/21/13236/0073
http://www.realchange.org/mccain.htm
http://fl0wer.net/secret_societies/skull_bones

PBS SPECIAL to Claim "Biblical Abraham never existed".

In November 2008, PBS will air a TV special claiming that the biblical patriarch
Abraham and his wife, Sarah, were not historical persons but were "myths." The
documentary will also declare the fabulous Israelite Exodus to be mythical,
rather than representing a miraculous "historical" event.

FYI: I just got the news that Tonight on the Jeff Rense show at www.rense.com this subject will be further discussed.

I AM A zionITE!

My Dear Friends,

Because I call myself Jesus of ZION I often get people who misunderstand and think that somehow my use of this word means that I might be a ZIONIST… When asked I say “No, I am a ZionITE.. Not a ZionIST .”

(see: Zionism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia )

My view on Zion is quite different than the Zionist view and frankly I teach that Zionism is a dangerous political movement which promotes racism, elitism and the idea that God somehow favors one group of individuals because they were born into the Hebrew bloodline and gives them the right to take control by force of land they claim was given them by God.

In 1967 I was a mere 6 years old yet I still recall my parents getting all excited that the 6-day war (see: Six-Day War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ) resulted in what they saw as the fulfillment of the Biblical Prophecy of the Jews being restored to Israel in preparation for Christ’s return.

Years later I would be in Churches as a preacher (I began preaching in churches at the age of 14) teaching the very same thing without researching anything of the history. I had been taught it and surely somebody authoritative must have checked it out and if they said it was the way it was.. Well then …who was I to question it?

I was taught the Zion was merely a single hill in Israel and that Zionism was just another word for being a Jew and thus All Jews = Israel = Zion(ism) = The Chosen People.

I was taught (and then spread and defended) this idea because I was told it was correct by Pastors, Teachers, Books and all the other religious media. I had never questioned it or explored the alternative ideas of Zion until I was in my Late 30’s and what God revealed to me eventually not only rocked my world but put me up against the entire Evangelical Christian Community.

But before you go and read what God revealed to me (at www.wwjsnl.com ) the first thing I need to do is educate you as to why Zionism (Both Nationalistic & it’s offshoot “Christian Zionism”) is absolutely 100% wrong.

Those who have been raised in traditionalist conservative Christian Evangelical faiths were, like I was, trained incorrectly and I plead with you to realize I am not asking you to deny your entire faith.. Just deny the parts that turn out to be untrue.

Yes, I know change is hard but if I am right YOU NEED THIS INFORMATION so you don’t lose your faith entirely later.. Because I will tell you right now what will happen all too soon will not jive with the “Dispensationalist” theologies you have often blindly accepted.

I wrote a Blog back some time ago regarding why Dispensationalism has dubious beginnings and was promoted by a man whose history and character is quite questionable named Cyrus Scofield .

(see: Scofield: The Man Behind The Myth )

C.I. Scofield was the man behind the “Scofield Reference Bible” and his notes became the unquestioned beliefs of many (including myself for most of my life.. Until I actually bothered to do the homework required to find out the facts.)

Now some of you are saying “I don’t have a clue what you are talking about.. I’m not a dispensationalist.. I’m a Presbyterian, Baptist, Methodist…etc!”.. Well, guess what… If you are in any Church that is listed there or claims any association to Evangelical Conservative Christianity… You were taught Dispensational Theology and need to get some education about it’s history as soon as possible.

(see: Dispensationalism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia )

Realize that most Dispensational Teachings include the idea and philosophy of “Christian Zionism”.. which, by the way is why our own country aligns itself with Nationalistic Israel and why John Hagee ( a rich and popular evangelical leader) had a huge conference and started a whole organization in support of Zionist Israel (usually ONLY referred to as “Israel”.)

Israel is NOT a country or a land .. It is a “People“.. TRUE ISRAEL is not at all related to race or Blood. It means literally “People of EL (God)” and is inclusive to all who believe in the God who is Love.

Most people do not even realize that there are Jews who are NOT ZIONISTS.. In Fact many Hebrew Rabbi’s denounce Zionism as being “satanic” and I fear I must agree.

The very idea that a single race of people can claim they are have a divine right to own a small piece of overpopulated desert real estate and then run out the residents because “God said it’s ours” is beyond ludicrous.. It’s just plain EVIL.. And if God worked that way I would actively oppose such a god.

I admit at one time I might have disbelieved what I am presenting.. But I cannot deny what I have learned after God gave me a vision to “SEEK THE TRUTH OF ZION for in ZION is hope of all mankind” (in this vision I was likewise informed that all that is popular regarding “Zion” in today’s conventional faiths is errant and I myself have been utterly blown away to find out this vision is showing itself thus far correct).

Nothing new is ever widely accepted.. Nor popular ..but please read all I present here and do the research yourself . See if perhaps you were following as blindly as I was taught to.. Because once again I cannot overemphasize that if man cannot learn how to LOVE then ZION will truly be our only real hope.. And soon we will be witnessing something that will cause the old view to be provably wrong which is sure to lead many to a huge crises in faith.. (SO.. Hear me now.. believe me later)

The History of Zionism & Judaism

This text is from an article called "An Open Letter" published in the Jewish magazine, "Hachoma". We think it provides a good historical overview of the history of Zionism and why the Zionist ideology is opposed by religious Orthodox Jews.

The Jewish people, from its inception, has been unique by its identity as a religious entity. Through the centuries its religious character had been a premise agreed upon by Jews and non-Jews alike. Our faith demands as the fundamental condition for recognition as a Jew, belief and adherence to the word of G-d, as was revealed to our forefathers on Mount Sinai. This is in itself, according to the tenets of the Jewish religion, sufficient to fulfill the definition of a Jew. Our religious and traditional history bears no aspect of racism.

Hence, one of non-Jewish origin is capable of being proselytized and attaining the same status as a born Jew. Conversely, one of Jewish birth who does not recognize his being bound to the Jewish Torah, is by Jewish law a heretic, and therefore forfeits his spiritual birthrights as a Jew.

The purpose of the Jew is to bear witness to the existence of G-d, through his adherence to the Torah. The Al-mighty granted the Jews the land of Israel as the particular setting which would serve as the most conducive atmosphere to their performance of their duties to G-d.

The Jews in ancient times were banished from the land of Israel because they had failed to fulfill their obligations to the Al-mighty. Every Jew acknowledges this in his prayers (Umipnei Chatoeinu Golinu Meiartzeinu). They accepted the penalty of exile and were at that time expressed sworn by the Al-mighty not to accelerate their redemption on their own, and especially not to rebel against the nations under whose rule they were found. To the contrary, every Jew is commanded to pray for the peace and well being of the government of which he is the subject.

Through all the years of exile, pious Jews as individuals were attracted to reside in the Holy Land because of its innate holy character and the opportunity it offered for the observance of various precepts bound in the land. Jews as a whole continue to pray that the Al-mighty return his Divine presence to the Land of Israel, by the coming of the Messiah, who will build His Temple, from whence will emanate Divine Wisdom and ultimate spiritual fulfillment of the entire human race.

Through the many years that Jews resided in the Holy Land for this purpose, they enjoyed tranquil and cordial relations with the non-Jewish population there.

The Zionist movement which was formed at the latter part of the last century, sought to endow the Jews with a nationalistic character which was heretofore strange to them. It sought to deprive them of their historically religious character and offered in substitution of faith in G-d and adherence to the Torah, and belief in their ultimate redemption by the coming of the Messiah, a nationalistic ideology and the possibility of establishing through political media, a Jewish national homeland.

During the period of the British Mandate, the Balfour Declaration, which recognized the eventual possibility of founding a Jewish national homeland, in Palestine, was affirmed to be the British government. The Jewish Agency, who then was the Chief representative of Zionist interests in the Holy Land, was entrusted with the issuance of visas to the Holy Land, thus resulting in an increased Zionist immigration from various parts of the world, which ultimately succeeded in superceding in numbers, the veteran Orthodox dwellers.

Orthodox Jewry all over the world and the Orthodox Community in the Holy Land in particular, immediately sensed in this stage of Zionist success, the threat of grave danger for the religious future of Jews. The Arab inhabitants began to exhibit open hostility to their Jewish neighbors. The British government failed to distinguish between the Orthodox community, who for generations in habited the Holy Land, and the newly arrived Zionist immigrants.

With the acquisition by the Zionist nationalists of the power to organize communities in Palestine, they formed the Vaad Haleumi Leknesset Yisroel (National Jewish Council Committee). This committee ignored the rights of the Orthodox veteran dwellers who did not recognize this validity of Jewish nationality, and whose identification as Jews was solely with their loyalty to their religious heritage. The religious inhabitants, on the other hand, shuddered at the prospects of spiritual disintegration of World Jewry, with the new rise to power of the Zionist nationalists.

The Orthodox inhabitants actively objected to being subject to the authority of the secularists. They appealed their cause to the League of Nations, who consequently granted them a "Right of exclusion" to the subjugation to the Vaad Haleumi, which rights provided that any Jew wishing not to be incorporated into the Vaad Haleumi, may remain lawfully independent if he so stated his wish in writing. Thousands of Jews did so.
Such was the case until November 1948, when the United Nations finally sanctioned the establishment of a Zionist State. We do not doubt that their success in finally realizing their goal was due in great measure to their having misled the world into viewing the
Zionist cause as the Jewish cause. The formation of the Zionist state resulted in the automatic deprivation of the autonomy heretofore possessed by the Orthodox inhabitants of the Holy Land.

The Zionists grasped in the acquisition of their new powers, the opportunity to openly disassociate themselves from any identification with Jews as a religion. They systematically began to orient the minds of their generations according to the tenets of Zionist nationalism. Through the Ministry of Religions they employed part of the Rabbinate to assist them in their aims.

The religious Jews who by virtue of their faith, clearly contradicted Zionist nationalism, and who had lived peacefully with their Arab neighbors for generations, became unwillingly identified with the Zionist cause and their struggle with the Arabs. They requested the United Nations that Jerusalem be designated as a defacto international city. They appealed to the diplomatic corps assigned to Jerusalem -- but to no avail. They were hence confronted with the choice of either becoming a part of the Zionist State, which diametrically opposed the interests of Jews as a religion, or abandoning the land of which their forefathers were the first Jewish settlers.

We find it of supreme importance to emphasize that we are fearful of the consequences of the Zionist rebellion against the Creator, as stated expressly in Jeremiah, "For it is bad and bitter your renunciation of G-d..." We wish not to be affected by the behavior of this government who in the name of Israel, persist in their renunciation and utter disregard of religious Judaism such as is clearly attested by their laws expressly permitting wanton autopsies (Law of Anatomy and Pathology, 1953), forcible desecration of the Sabbath (Law of Emergency Labor Draft 1967: PPS 1, 19; 27, 36), profanation of Holy Sites by retaining non-religious custodians, desecration of Holy Cemeteries by Safed, Beth Shearim and elsewhere, and countless more examples, proof of which is readily available.
Insofar as all human being find necessary the protection of their rights as human beings, we hereby request all those that find it within their power, to aid us in reacquiring the rights we possessed prior to the formation of the Zionist State*, to remain lawfully independent of the Zionist authority.
_____________

* The Laws of Palestine -- Robert Drayton -- Volume 3, Page 213B -- Chapter 126, Paragraph 17(4) -- January 1, 1928.

Any person who desires his name to be struck off the register shall, within one month of the publication or the relevant portion thereof, give notice, either personally or by an agent duly authorized in writing, to the General Council (Vaad Leumi) which shall acknowledge the receipt of the notice and strike off his name accordingly; he may send a copy of such notice to the office of the district commissioner.
_____________

Historical Progression of Zionism

18th century: The German Jewish philosopher Moses Mendelssohn initiates a Jewish secularism, which focused on Jewish national identity.

1862: The German Jew Moses Hess publishes the book Rome and Jerusalem where he called for a return of Jews to Palestine. He also said that Jews would never succeed by assimilating into European societies.

1881: Pogroms of Russia result in heavy emigration to USA. Some few Jews even emigrates to Palestine, as they are motivated by religious ideas of Palestine as Jewish homeland.

1893: Nathan Birnbaum introduces the term 'Zionism'.

1896: The Austrian Jew Theodor Herzl publishes the book The Jewish State, where he declares that the cure for anti-semitism was the establishment of a Jewish state. As he saw it, the best place to establish this state was in Palestine, but this geography was no precondition.

1897: The 1st Zionist Congress is held in Basel in Switzerland. 200 delegates participates. The Basel Program is formulated, which calls for the creation of a Jewish homeland in Palestine, where Jews could live safely under public law. The World Zionist organization is also established, and establishes its head quarters in Vienna, Austria.

1903: Britain offers an area of 15,500 km² in Uganda in Africa, an area of virgin land to the Jews of the world, where a Jewish homeland could be established.

1905: 7th Zionist Congress refuses Britain's Uganda proposal. Israel Zangwill forms the Jewish Territorial organization, which sought to find territory for a Jewish state, no matter where this would be. His organization got only few supporters. — After the Russian revolution is defeated, many young Jews emigrate from Russia.

1917: The Balfour Declaration, issued by the British foreign secretary, gives official British support to the work on establishing a Jewish homeland in Palestine.

1922: Britain gives The World Zionist organization the mandate to administer Jewish immigration and settlement in Palestine. This immigration and settlement was funded by American Jews.

1939: The British 'White Paper' gives the Arabs of Palestine de facto control over Jewish immigration.

1942: A call is issued from Zionist leaders for the establishment of a Jewish state in all of western Palestine, when World War II ends.

1948 May 14: The State of Israel is founded. The World Zionist organization continues to back Jewish immigration to Israel.

1970s: The World Zionist organization puts its muscles into helping Jews in the Soviet Union to emigrate to Israel.

1975 November 10: UN General Assembly passes Resolution 3379, in which Zionism is declared "racist", with 72 votes to 35 (32 abstentions).

1991 December 16: UN General Assembly revokes Resolution 3379, with 111 votes to 25 (13 abstentions).

"Zionism" by Tore Kjeilen, article in the Encyclopaedia of the Orient, Oslo, Norway. Last modified Aug. 22, 2004.
http://lexicorient.com/cgi-bin/eo-direct.pl?zionism.htm

SOURCE: http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com/zionism/history.cfm
____________________________________________________________________________________

Also Read This when you have time:

Jewish leaders wake up to dangers of campaign to delegitimize Israel
http://zionism-israel.com/israel_news/2007/07/jewish-leaders-wake-up-to-dangers-of.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Following is an Article from a Jewish Source regarding CHRISTIAN ZIONISM:

LINK: http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Zionism/christianzionism.html

Christian Zionism can be defined as Christian support for the Zionist cause — the return of the Jewish people to its biblical homeland in Israel. It is a belief among some Christians that the return of Jews to Israel is in line with a biblical prophecy, and is necessary for Jesus to return to Earth as its king. These Christians are partly motivated by the writings of the Bible and the words of the prophets. However, they are also driven to support Israel because they wish to “repay the debt of gratitude to the Jewish people for providing Christ and the other fundamentals of their faith,” and to support a political ally, according to David Brog, author Standing With Israel: Why Christians Support the Jewish State.

Christian Zionists interpret both the Torah and the New Testament as prophetic texts that describe future events of how the world will one day end with the return of Jesus from Heaven to rule on Earth. Israel and its people are central to their vision. They interpret passages from the books of Ezekiel, Daniel, and Isaiah as foreshadowing the coming Christian era. The New Testament Book of Revelation is read by many Christians as a prophetic text of how the world will be in the End Times.

Christian support for Israel is not a recent development. Its political roots reach as far back to the 1880s, when a man named William Hechler formed a committee of Christian Zionists to help move Russian Jewish refugees to Palestine after a series of pogroms. In 1884, Hechler wrote a pamphlet called “The Restoration of Jews to Palestine According to the Prophets.” A few years later, he befriended Theodor Herzl after reading Herzl’s book The Jewish State, and joined Herzl to drum up support for Zionism. Hechler even arranged a meeting between Herzl and Kaiser Wilhelm II to discuss Herzl’s proposal to establish a Jewish state in Palestine. The two men remained close friends up until Herzl’s death in 1904.

An important milestone in the history of Christian Zionism occurred in 1979, almost a century after William Hechler approached Herzl and offered to mobilize Christian support for a Jewish state: the founding of the Moral Majority. Founded by Rev. Jerry Falwell, the Moral Majority was an organization made up of conservative Christian political action committees that succeeded in mobilizing like-minded individuals to register and vote for conservative candidates. With nearly six million members, it became a powerful voting bloc during the 1980s and was credited for giving Ronald Reagan the winning edge in the 1980 elections. One of the Moral Majority’s four founding principles was “support for Israel and Jewish people everywhere.”

In 1980, Falwell, who ran a television ministry that reached millions of viewers, said of Israel: “I firmly believe God has blessed America because America has blessed the Jew. If this nation wants her fields to remain white with grain, her scientific achievements to remain notable, and her freedom to remain intact, America must continue to stand with Israel.” Falwell disbanded the Moral Majority in 1989, but conservative Christians have remained vocal supporters of Israel though they lacked a strong formal structure for pro-Israel political action.

Christian Zionists, through their volunteer work, political support, and financial assistance to Israel and Jewish causes, have shown that they are stalwart friends of Israel. They have donated large sums of money to support Israel, including to charities that pay the costs of bringing Jews from the former Soviet Union and Ethiopia to Israel. For example, Pastor John Hagee has raised more than $4.7 million for the United Jewish Communities. Pat Robertson’s Christian Broadcasting Network has donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to help poor Jews across the world move to Israel.

When Israel’s tourism industry was at a low point between 2000 and 2003 due to the Palestinian War and terrorism, Christian tourists visited Israel in numbers that were sometimes greater than that of the Jewish community. Televangelists such as Pat Robertson and Benny Hinn visited Israel during this period and used their broadcasts to tell their millions of viewers it was safe to visit Israel. Another pro-Israel group, the Christians’ Israel Public Action Campaign, sponsored four missions to Israel. Christians also helped the Israeli tourism industry and economy from home by attending “Shop Israel” days where Israeli merchants would come to America and sell their products.
Despite their support for Israel, many Jews however, are uncomfortable with Christian Zionists. This discomfort is fed by Christian anti-Semitism, Christian replacement theology, evangelical proselytizing, and disagreements over domestic and political issues.

Dispensationalist Christianity, an interpretive or narrative framework for understanding the overall flow of the Bible, teaches that Christianity did not replace Judaism, but that it restored lost elements of it. The dispensationalist view of the Bible is that the Old Testament is foreshadowing for what will occur in the New Testament and, at the end, Jesus returns to reign on Earth after an epic battle between good and evil. Israel plays a central role in the dispensationalist view of the end of the world. The establishment of Israel in 1948 was seen as a milestone to many dispensationalists on the path toward Jesus’ return. In their minds, now that the Jews again had regained their homeland, all Jews were able to return to Israel, just as had been prophesied in the Bible. As described in the Book of Revelation, there is an epic battle that will take place in Israel after it is reestablished — Armageddon — in which it is prophesied that good will finally triumph over evil. However, in the process, two-thirds of the Jews in Israel die and the other third are converted to Christianity. Jesus then returns to Earth to rule for 1,000 years as king.

Although these Christians do hope for a Messianic age, the majority of them do not wish for the deaths of thousands of Jews during Armageddon. Dispensationalist Christians believe that the Jewish people, not Christians, are the ones who were promised Israel in the Bible. In their view, Christianity did not come into existence to replace Judaism, but to restore it. This view has surpassed replacement theology as the dominant form of Christian thought regarding Israel in America today. Jews who are suspicious of Christian Zionist motives are usually unaware that many Christian supporters of Israel have abandoned replacement theology.

Aside from anti-Semitism and Christian replacement theology, many Jews are wary of the fact that many evangelical Christians simply want to convert them to Christianity or speed up the Second Coming of Christ. David Brog refutes this claim:

“Evangelicals who support Israel most certainly do want to convert people. Evangelicals who don’t support Israel also want to convert people. The mission of sharing the ‘good news’ of Jesus Christ is central to being an evangelical. But it is important to note that this is not about converting just the Jews — Christians want to share their faith with Hindus, Muslims, Buddhists and their Christian friends and neighbors who have yet to be born again. The important question is this: Is evangelical support for Israel merely a tool in the effort to convert the Jews? Is this merely some scheme to soften the Jews up so that they can better sell Jesus to them? And the answer to this question is absolutely not. If anything, the opposite it true.

Christian Zionists say Jews have no reason to distrust their motives for supporting Israel because they do not believe they can speed up the Second Coming of Christ. In the Gospel of Matthew, it is written that Jesus said about his return, “But of that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, but My Father only.”

Pastor John Hagee, a longtime supporter of Israel, based at the Cornerstone Church in San Antonio, Texas, heads Christians United for Israel (CUFI), a pro-Israel group established in 2006. Hagee has denounced replacement theology, and says of Israel: “We believe in the promise of Genesis 12:3 regarding the Jewish people and the nation of Israel. We believe that this is an eternal covenant between God and the seed of Abraham to which God is faithful.” Evangelical leader Pat Robertson echoed this statement while on his tour of Israel during the Israel-Hezbollah war, saying, “The Jews are God’s chosen people. Israel is a special nation that has a special place in God’s heart. He will defend this nation. So Evangelical Christians stand with Israel. That is one of the reasons I am here.”

Pastor Hagee claims that he and other Christian Zionists support Israel because they owe a debt of gratitude to the Jewish people, and not because they want Jews to convert to Christianity. The Jewish people gave the world Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and the prophets, of whom there were “not a Baptist in the bunch...The Jewish people do not need Christianity to explain their existence. But Christians cannot explain our existence without Judaism. The roots of Christianity are Jewish.”

Jews are also uncomfortable with Christian Zionists because most have few other common political interests besides their support for Israel. The majority of American Jews are politically and socially liberal. Christian Zionists are on the whole politically conservative Republicans who, for example, oppose abortion and gay marriage, and support prayer in public schools. Most Jews are particularly concerned over what they see as the Christian Right’s efforts to weaken the separation between church and state. The Anti-Defamation League’s director, Abe Foxman, has been particularly outspoken and has said that if the domestic agenda of the Christian Right ever materializes, it will turn American Jews into “second-class citizens in our own country.”

Christian Zionists are also more conservative on Israel than many Jews. They favor Israel maintaining all of its settlements in the West Bank, and were opposed to the Israeli disengagement from the Gaza Strip. Some prominent Christian Zionists have been highly critical of Israeli government policy of giving over parts of Israel to the Palestinian people. Christian Zionists, like followers of the Israeli Right, believe that Israel should never cede any section of Israel to the Palestinians because Israel was given to the Jews by God. After former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon implemented the disengagement plan from the Gaza Strip and then fell ill a few months later, Pat Robertson claimed that his illness was divine retribution for giving up part of biblical Israel. When asked about Prime Minister Ehud Olmert’s convergence plan to evacuate settlements in the West Bank, Robertson said, “It’s an absolute disaster...I don't think the holy God is going to be happy about someone giving up his land.”

Conservative Christians, in general, are viewed as particularly influential with the Bush Administration and Republican Congress, and Christian Zionists are consequently viewed as also having greater access to decision makers. It is not clear, however, that pro-Israel Christians have exerted decisive influence on any significant decisions and their clout is expected to decline if Democrats regain the White House and/or the majority in Congress.

Sources: Brog, David. Standing With Israel: Why Christians Support the Jewish State. FL: Frontline, 2006.; Wikipedia; David Brog; International Fellowship of Christians and Jews; Christians United for Israel; JTA; Q and A with Kathryn Jean Lopez, “Jews And Evangelicals Together: Why some Christians are pro-Israel,” National Review Online, (May 22, 2006); Tovah Lazaroff, “‘Evangelicals the world over are praying for Israel,’” The Jerusalem Post, (August 9, 2006).
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Please Check, Study, Cross Reference and Fact Check .. Because Before you will ever believe the next step of what ZION really is you first need to dispel the many errors that have resulted from false teachings so ingrained in the popular religious culture. Remember POPULAR is a WIDE PATH and rarely is the WIDE PATH the RIGHT PATH.. Right?

(MORE TO COME on this and for even more go to all the tabs marked “Zion” at: www.wwjsnl.com)

I know this was super long but if I am right then it’s important and I pray you recall at the proper time where you read it.. As I said earlier.. “hear me now.. Believe me later”

BE LOVE & BE LOVED!
JoZ

VERICHIP OFFICIAL COMPANY SITE: www.verichipcorp.com
FOR MORE INFORMATION ON VERICHIP GO TO: www.wethepeoplewillnotbechipped.com

BE LOVE & BE LOVED!

GOD: TRINITY OR "UNLIMI-ty"?

Most traditional Christian Churches have adopted a doctrinal belief in what is called the “TRINITY“.

It may surprise some that the word “Trinity” is at no time actually seen anywhere in the Bible.

I have personally done a word search at Bible Gateway in each version of the Bible available at that site and it continues to show “No Results“.. Yet this belief seems to be so ingrained within the doctrines of most Christian Churches that no one dare question it.

I shall not suggest that God is not a multi-dimensional being… In my way of believing He is an “UNLIMITED-DIMENTIONAL” BEING .. Thus to contain God into only THREE parts is to LIMIT an UNLIMITED GOD.

It is my contention that since God is beyond limits that to affirm a belief that He is only manifest in three parts places God into a box and tries to weigh and measure Him in accordance with that rather than realizing that there is NO BOX THAT COULD EVER CONTAIN ALL THAT IS GOD… Thus I cannot ascribe to a dogma that limits God no matter how popular it might be.

So we can speak intelligently on this difference I have with this commonly accepted doctrine let us first examine the definition of the Trinity (from Wikipedia):
------------------------------------------------------
TRINITY (Source Wikipedia)

Central[1][2] to Christianity, Trinity is the doctrine that God is one being who exists, simultaneously and eternally, as a mutual indwelling of three persons (not to be confused by "person"): the Father, the Son (incarnate as Jesus of Nazareth), and the Holy Spirit. Since the 4th century, in both Eastern Christianity and Western Christianity, this doctrine has been stated as "three persons in one God," all three of whom, as distinct and co-eternal persons, are of one indivisible Divine essence, a simple being. The doctrine also teaches that the Son Himself has two distinct natures, one fully divine and the other fully human, united in a hypostatic union. Supporting the doctrine of the Trinity is known as Trinitarianism. Most divisions of Christianity are Trinitarian, and regard belief in the Trinity as a test of Christian orthodoxy.

Opposing nontrinitarian positions held by some groups include Binitarianism (two deities/persons/aspects), Unitarianism (one deity/person/aspect), the Godhead (Latter Day Saints) (three separate beings, one in purpose) and Modalism (Oneness).
Historically, the post-New Testament[1] doctrine of Trinitarianism is of particular importance. The conflict with Arianism, as well as other competing theological concepts during the fourth century, became the first major doctrinal confrontation in Church history. It had a particularly lasting effect within the Western Roman Empire where the Germanic Arians and Nicene Christians formed a segregated social order.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The verses of the Bible that would appear to support the “Trinity Theory” are quite scant… In fact, I can locate only one single verse which would seem to strongly support it (at first glance) and another which would seem to support a portion of it.. Yet if we examine even these in greater detail and in their original language perhaps we can get a better handle on their real meaning.



1 John 5:7 (KJV)
For there are three that bear record in heaven,
the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost:
and these three are one.

John 10:30 (KJV)
I and my Father are one.

The Original texts of these verses were written in Greek and in translation we often see that a word we think we understand fully actually had a different usage or subtle variance in meaning from one language to another.

Many people are unaware that John was a student of Cabalistic thought and much of his writing comes at things from that angle. Cabalism does not rely on literalism (the most common mistake made by those who never study beyond their own understandings) and so one cannot read anything written by John and assess it properly only through Western (Roman) thought processes.

Most of the doctrinal errors that divide churches are because of the fact that people use their westernized mind to try and understand when really we should be trying to comprehend from the perspective of the author and his (or her) mental positioning.

In the First Verse above (1 John 5:7) there is (to the Western based mind) definitive statements are being made (“there are three”.. “these three are one“) and so we block it in and wrap it up and it’s a done deal… but does this verse REALLY mean to say that there are ONLY THREE or does it qualify what is meant by ONE.

First when it reads “There are three who bear record in heaven” I see nothing to suggest that this is intended to limit God only to these THREE…in fact even a western mind should clearly see that these are but the three “Record Bearers” and is not suggesting that these are the only parts of God in extent.. They are only the parts of God which are in agreement regarding the “record”.

As for the use of “One” in both the first and second verses above the actually original word used is “heis (gr)” and this actually means something different than being “THE SAME EXACT THING” as the western mind wishes to perceive it.

Heis is used of unity in Gal 3:28, "for you are all one in Christ Jesus." In the latter passage, the word one is in grammatical agreement with the word "all," but this does show that heis can also be used for “union”.

Just as when people are married they are considered “ONE” (heis) and yet remain distinct individuals .. So too must we allow the word “One” herein to have it’s proper use meaning “UNION” (or more simply “In conjunction with each other”).

The biggest problem with the traditional “Trinitarian” concept of God is that it attempts to make God less than He is through limiting His deity to ONLY THREE PARTS and we do this because we ourselves are limited to a 3-D world (Thus, we have a tendency to compartmentalize things into groups of only three) But again… GOD IS AN UNLIMITY and any being who could be divided and limited to only a single set of Three certainly could NOT be God.

The following verses allude to an Equality between The Father, Jesus and the Holy Spirit and were given as support of the previous two verses in a short thesis on the subject posted in a friends blog .. Yet again I really see no evidence to support that God is limited only to “Three persons” in any of these (in fact, in the second verse used above the Holy Spirit seems absent from the “equality status” and if it stood alone would seem to be more in support of a “two part” rather than “three-part” unity).

Deu 6:4 (KJV)
Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD:

Gen 3:22a (KJV)
And the LORD God said,
Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil:


Heb 1:1-3 (KJV)
God, who at sundry times and in divers manners
spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets,
{2} Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son,
whom he hath appointed heir of all things,
by whom also he made the worlds;
{3} Who being the brightness of his glory,
and the express image of his person,
and upholding all things by the word of his power,
when he had by himself purged our sins,
sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high;

1 Cor 8:6 (KJV)
But to us there is but one God, the Father,
>are all things, and we in him;
and one Lord Jesus Christ,
by whom are all things, and we by him.

John 5:17-23 (KJV)
But Jesus answered them, My Father worketh hitherto, and I work.
{18} Therefore the Jews sought the more to kill him,
because he not only had broken the sabbath,
but said also that God was his Father,
making himself equal with God.
{19} Then answered Jesus and said unto them,
Verily, verily, I say unto you,
The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do:
for what things soever he doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise.
{20} For the Father loveth the Son,
and showeth him all things that himself doeth:
and he will show him greater works than these, that ye may marvel.
{21} For as the Father raiseth up the dead, and quickeneth them;
even so the Son quickeneth whom he will.
{22} For the Father judgeth no man,
but hath committed all judgment unto the Son:
{23} That all men should honour the Son, even as they honour the Father.
He that honoureth not the Son honoureth not the Father which hath sent him.

John 14:23-26 (KJV)
Jesus answered and said unto him,
If a man love me, he will keep my words:
and my Father will love him,
and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him.
{24} He that loveth me not keepeth not my sayings:
and the word which ye hear is not mine, but the Father's which sent me.
{25} These things have I spoken unto you, being yet present with you.
{26} But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost,
whom the Father will send in my name,
he shall teach you all things,
and bring all things to your remembrance,
whatsoever I have said unto you.

John 14:9-21 (KJV)
Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you,
and yet hast thou not known me, Philip?
he that hath seen me hath seen the Father;
and how sayest thou then, Show us the Father?
{10} Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in me?
the words that I speak unto you I speak not of myself:
but the Father that dwelleth in me, he doeth the works.
{11} Believe me that I am in the Father, and the Father in me:
or else believe me for the very works' sake.
{12} Verily, verily, I say unto you,
He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also;
and greater works than these shall he do; because I go unto my Father.
{13} And whatsoever ye shall ask in my name,
that will I do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son.
{14} If ye shall ask any thing in my name, I will do it.
15} If ye love me, keep my commandments.
{16} And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter,
that he may abide with you for ever;
{17} Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive,
because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him:
but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you.
{18} I will not leave you comfortless: I will come to you.
{19} Yet a little while, and the world seeth me no more;
but ye see me: because I live, ye shall live also.
{20} At that day ye shall know
that I am in my Father, and ye in me, and I in you.
{21} He that hath my commandments,
and keepeth them, he it is that loveth me:
and he that loveth me shall be loved of my Father,
and I will love him, and will manifest myself to him.


So, is GOD (The ALL-BEING) to be limited by the number THREE???

Humanity may be limited by numbers but by my way of thinking God is greater that the highest of numbers that can be comprehended in the minds of men.

Father, Son and Spirit is/are indeed part of the ONE GOD but I can find nothing that would suggest that these three are the ONLY parts which make up the INFINATE GOD IN WHICH I BELIEVE,, MY GOD IS AN “UNLIMI-ty”!

BE LOVE & BE LOVED!